FL: Group sues Seminole County, sheriff over sex-offender rules

An organization that works to reform sex-offender laws in Florida is suing Seminole County and Sheriff Don Eslinger, alleging that a decade-old county ordinance is so restrictive that it prevents registered sex offenders from traveling to a grocery store, eating out at a restaurant or, in some cases, even leaving their homes.

According to Seminole’s ordinance, sexual offenders or predators in most cases are not allowed to “travel through or remain within” 1,000 feet of schools, parks, day care centers or playgrounds. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We are proud of the Florida Action Committee and its courageous actions in challenging local laws that do not increase but instead reduce public safety. Our hope is that the Florida judiciary acts wisely and overturns these laws which violate the U.S. Constitution.

This Seminole County ordinance is a perfect example of a how-the-Hell-is-one-to-know law! Seriously, I often wonder how legitimate such laws can be if there exists no mechanism to inform the general public of the law’s existence.?? Some laws are obvious – no bank robbing, murdering, or cattle-rustling. But it seems to me that there must be some legal merit to the argument that lack of public notification makes such laws null & void. Otherwise, lawmakers could secretly create any number of laws to be employed at their discretion against whomever they choose!

Well written article! This is another example of hateful legislators who simply want to demoralize people. I can’t imagine how anyone expects a person to rehabilitate themselves by forcing them to be homeless, preventing them employment and preventing them to visit a grocery store? This is sick! It’s hurtful and clearly would create anger and hatred amongst the local residence. It’s flat out sick. A gang member, drug dealer or murderer has more rights!

The laws and why they are made so punitive against registered citizens. Any law that is harmful and restrictive to registrants in ANY and all forms are somehow twisted into the logic of it being responsible actions placed for the protection of children. The “to protect the children” logic works and is very hard to argued against. We can take our state back…Janice and her hard charging team have made a lot of headway but we should all do our part and help her any and every way we can. Janice says it best, “Show up, Stand up and Speak up.” Together we can make a difference. We’re training RSO’s and their families on how to fight back during this 2016 election year. Come join the fight…oh, and learn a skill to make some income while doing so! It’s fun and meaningful.